List of questions about [Crypto Investment]

Nexo Launches Zero-Interest Crypto Lending for Bitcoin and Ether Holders

Entering the world of cryptocurrency trading can feel like stepping into the cockpit of a fighter jet. There are flashing lights, moving charts, and a dozen different buttons to press. If you don't know what you are doing, you can crash and burn very quickly.

Many beginners make the mistake of thinking trading is just about clicking "Buy" or "Sell." In reality, how you enter and exit a trade is just as important as what you trade. To navigate the volatility of the crypto market, you need to master the different Order Types. These are the tools that allow you to control price, manage risk, and automate your strategy.

Speed vs. Precision: Market and Limit Orders

The two most fundamental order types represent a choice between speed and price.

1. Market Orders (The "Now" Button)
A Market Order is the simplest type. It tells the exchange: "Buy or sell this asset right now, at the best available price."

• Pros: Guaranteed execution. You will get into the trade instantly.
• Cons: You have no control over the price. In a fast-moving market, "Slippage" can occur, meaning you might end up paying a higher price than you expected because the lowest sell orders were consumed instantly. Use this when speed is the only thing that matters.

2. Limit Orders (The Sniper)
A Limit Order tells the exchange: "Buy or sell this asset only at this specific price (or better)."

• Pros: Price guarantee. You will never pay more than you want.
• Cons: No guarantee of execution. If the market price never reaches your limit price, your trade will simply sit there unfilled. Use this when you are patient and want a specific entry point.

The Safety Nets: Stop-Loss and Stop-Limit

Once you are in a trade, you need to protect your capital. This is where "Stop" orders come in.

3. Stop-Loss Orders (The Insurance Policy)
A Stop-Loss is an instruction to sell your asset if the price drops to a certain level. It is an automated exit plan designed to limit your losses.

• Example: You buy Bitcoin at $90,000. You set a Stop-Loss at $85,000. If the price crashes while you are asleep, the system automatically sells your position at $85,000 to prevent you from losing more.

4. Stop-Limit Orders
This is a more advanced version. When the "Stop" price is hit, instead of selling immediately (Market Order), it places a "Limit Order" to sell.

• Risk: If the price crashes too fast, it might skip over your limit price entirely, leaving you holding the bag. For beginners, a standard Stop-Loss is usually safer.

Locking in Gains: The Trailing Stop

One of the most powerful tools for capturing a bull run is the Trailing Stop.

This is a dynamic order that follows the price as it goes up. If you set a trailing stop of 5%, and Bitcoin rises from $90k to $100k, your stop price moves up with it. However, if the price drops by 5%, the order freezes and executes the sell.

• Benefit: It allows you to let your profits run while automatically securing gains if the trend reverses.

Conclusion

Successful trading isn't about predicting the future; it is about managing risk. By using Limit orders to enter and Stop-Loss orders to protect yourself, you remove emotion from the equation. You stop gambling and start executing a plan.

When you look at a trading screen, it looks like a chaotic wall of flashing numbers. But behind the scenes, every trade falls into one of two categories: Makers or Takers.

Understanding this distinction isn't just academic; it directly impacts your wallet. Exchanges use a "Maker-Taker" fee model, meaning the price you pay for a trade depends on whether you are providing liquidity to the market or taking it away.

The Engine of the Market: Liquidity

To understand the difference, you first need to understand the Order Book. This is the list of all buy and sell orders waiting to be filled.

• Liquidity: This represents how easy it is to buy or sell an asset without moving the price.
• The Ecosystem: A healthy market needs both makers (who put orders on the book) and takers (who fill those orders).

Who is the Market Maker?

A Market Maker is a trader who provides liquidity. They place "Limit Orders" that do not execute immediately. For example, if Bitcoin is at $95,000, a Maker might place a buy order at $94,500.

That order sits in the order book, adding depth to the market. Because Makers help the exchange by ensuring there is always liquidity available, they are often rewarded with lower trading fees (or sometimes even rebates).

US Senate Judiciary Pushes Back Against Crypto Developer Protections

A growing divide within the US Senate is threatening to reshape the future of crypto regulation, as top lawmakers from both parties move to strip developer safeguards from a key digital asset bill. The dispute highlights rising concerns that proposed protections could unintentionally weaken law enforcement’s ability to combat illicit financial activity in decentralized crypto markets.

At the center of the debate is the Senate’s long-anticipated crypto market structure legislation, which aims to clarify how regulators oversee digital assets and blockchain-based platforms. However, Senate Judiciary Committee leaders argue that parts of the bill could open dangerous loopholes for criminals operating through decentralized systems.

Bipartisan Warning From the Senate Judiciary Committee

Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Charles Grassley and the committee’s senior Democrat, Richard Durbin, issued a rare bipartisan warning to leaders of the Senate Banking Committee. In a letter sent to Banking Chair Tim Scott and ranking member Elizabeth Warren, the lawmakers urged major revisions to the bill’s language.

According to Grassley and Durbin, the current draft risks undermining long-standing unlicensed money transmitter laws by shielding certain crypto developers and network operators from liability. They warned that this could severely limit the government’s ability to pursue bad actors who exploit decentralized platforms for illegal purposes.

The letter, first reported by Politico, described the proposed protections as creating a  significant enforcement gap  that sophisticated criminal organizations could take advantage of.

Lawmakers Fear Criminal Exploitation of Decentralized Platforms

Grassley and Durbin emphasized that criminal groups already rely on advanced methods to hide illegal transactions, including the use of complex financial structures and anonymizing technologies. They argued that the bill, as currently written, would make it even harder for prosecutors to trace and punish unlawful activity tied to decentralized digital assets.

In their view, removing accountability from developers and network maintainers could turn decentralized platforms into attractive safe havens for illicit actors, including transnational criminal organizations and cartels. The senators stressed that regulatory clarity should not come at the cost of weakening public safety or financial crime enforcement.

The Role of the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act

The controversy largely stems from the inclusion of provisions inspired by the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, or BRCA. This proposal seeks to clarify that individuals who develop blockchain software or maintain decentralized networks are not automatically classified as money transmitters under federal or state law.

Supporters argue that such protections are necessary to foster innovation and prevent developers from being punished for how others use open-source technology. Critics, however, warn that overly broad exemptions could shield individuals who play a more active role in facilitating illicit transactions.

Grassley and Durbin contend that the bill fails to clearly distinguish between neutral software development and conduct that effectively enables unlicensed money transmission.

Judiciary Committee Says It Was Left Out of the Process

Adding to the tension, the Senate Judiciary Committee leaders said they were not consulted during the drafting of the bill, despite their committee’s authority over federal criminal statutes and the Department of Justice.

They expressed frustration that proposed changes affecting criminal enforcement were advanced without giving the Judiciary Committee a meaningful opportunity to review or weigh in. In their letter, they urged the Banking Committee to reject any language that could weaken the government’s ability to hold culpable actors accountable.

This procedural dispute has further complicated efforts to move the legislation forward.

Legislative Delays and Political Uncertainty

The crypto market structure bill has already faced setbacks, with both the Senate Banking and Agriculture Committees postponing scheduled markups in an effort to build broader bipartisan support. The latest objections from the Judiciary Committee add another obstacle to an already fragile legislative path.

If the bill eventually reaches the Senate floor, it will require at least 60 votes to pass. That threshold would likely demand unanimous Republican support and backing from several Democrats, making any internal disagreement particularly consequential.

Crypto Industry Support Begins to Fracture

Industry reaction has also been mixed. Coinbase, one of the most influential lobbying forces in the crypto sector, withdrew its support for the bill earlier this week, citing concerns over multiple provisions. While the company has since indicated that negotiations with lawmakers are ongoing, the move underscored growing unease within the industry.

The combination of political resistance and shifting industry alliances raises questions about whether the bill can survive in its current form.

What This Means for the Future of US Crypto Regulation

The clash over developer protections reflects a broader struggle to balance innovation with enforcement in the rapidly evolving crypto space. Lawmakers face mounting pressure to define clear rules without creating blind spots that criminals can exploit.

As negotiations continue behind closed doors, the fate of the crypto market structure bill remains uncertain. What is clear, however, is that the debate has entered a critical phase—one that could shape how decentralized technologies are regulated in the United States for years to come.

Why Monero Mining is Capturing Attention in 2025

Could Europe Really Weaponize U.S. Debt Over Greenland?

The recent geopolitical tension between the United States and Europe has pushed an old, uncomfortable question back into the spotlight: what happens if allies start using finance as a weapon? As Washington’s ambitions around Greenland stirred political nerves across Europe, whispers began circulating in policy circles about extreme countermeasures — including the once-unthinkable idea of selling off U.S. debt.

While a temporary cooling of tensions followed discussions at Davos, European leaders are no longer assuming stability as a given. Instead, they are quietly assessing how much leverage they truly possess in a world where economics, finance, and geopolitics are increasingly intertwined.

From Trade Wars to Financial Warfare

Europe’s first instinct has been economic retaliation through trade. The so-called  trade bazooka — a mechanism that could effectively restrict U.S. companies from accessing the EU’s vast single market — remains on the table. Such a move would hurt American corporations immediately, cutting off revenues worth billions.

But beyond tariffs and trade barriers lies something far more explosive: finance. Europe collectively holds trillions of dollars in U.S. assets, including Treasury bonds that help fund Washington’s deficits. Some policymakers have begun asking whether those holdings could be transformed from a symbol of trust into a source of pressure.

The Nuclear Option: Selling U.S. Treasurys

The idea gained traction after prominent voices suggested that dumping U.S. debt could destabilize the dollar, spike inflation, and ultimately hurt American voters. The logic is straightforward on paper: if a major bloc like Europe suddenly reduces exposure to U.S. Treasurys, borrowing costs would rise and confidence in the dollar could weaken.

Deutsche Bank’s FX strategists have pointed out that despite America’s military and economic dominance, it relies heavily on foreign capital to finance its persistent external deficits. Foreign investors hold an enormous share of U.S. bonds and equities, making the system sensitive to sudden shifts in sentiment.

Yet financial systems rarely behave like political theories.

Why Dumping U.S. Debt Is Easier Said Than Done

In practice, Europe faces enormous structural barriers to executing such a strategy. Much of the U.S. debt held in Europe does not sit on government balance sheets. Instead, it belongs to pension funds, banks, insurance companies, hedge funds, and institutional investors whose primary mandate is performance, not politics.

For European governments to force these entities to sell would require unprecedented regulatory intervention — a move that could undermine investor confidence in Europe itself. Financial experts widely agree that such steps would only be considered if tensions escalated far beyond current levels.

Even more importantly, investors hold U.S. Treasurys for one overriding reason: there is no true substitute.

The Absence of a Real Alternative to U.S. Debt

Despite ongoing discussions about de-dollarization, the U.S. Treasury market remains unparalleled in size, liquidity, and perceived safety. Even countries like Germany, often cited as alternatives, simply do not issue debt at a scale capable of absorbing global demand.

Asia, meanwhile, lacks the capacity to replace Europe as a buyer if a mass sell-off occurred. China has already slowed its Treasury purchases, and emerging Asian markets are far too small to absorb trillions of dollars in displaced capital.

In short, a coordinated exit from U.S. debt would create chaos — but not necessarily a clean escape route for Europe.

Stablecoins Quietly Step Into the Picture

While governments debate strategy, a new class of buyers has been rapidly accumulating U.S. debt: stablecoin issuers.

Recent U.S. legislation has cemented the role of Treasurys as core reserves backing dollar-pegged stablecoins. As digital dollars grow in adoption, issuers are required to hold increasing amounts of U.S. government debt, effectively turning crypto infrastructure into a major pillar of Treasury demand.

This shift creates an unusual feedback loop. On one hand, it strengthens U.S. debt markets by introducing a fast-growing buyer base. On the other, it ties the health of Treasury liquidity to the stability of the stablecoin sector — a market that has already shown signs of stress during periods of panic.

When Liquidity Becomes the Real Risk

History has already provided warnings. Liquidity shocks in the U.S. Treasury market have surfaced during moments of extreme stress, including the global crisis of 2020 and more recent disruptions in 2025. If Europe were to significantly reduce its exposure while stablecoin issuers faced redemption pressure, the system could be pushed into dangerous territory.

In such a scenario, forced selling could overwhelm available buyers, threatening both Treasury market stability and the credibility of dollar-backed digital assets.

Where Crypto Platforms Like BYDFi Fit In

This is arguably the most important benefit. In the traditional system, your money in a bank is not truly yours; it is a liability the bank owes you. The bank has the ultimate control to freeze, seize, or block your funds. With cryptocurrency, when you hold your assets in a personal wallet where you control the private keys, you have self-custody. This means you are the only person on earth who can access and move your funds. It is the financial equivalent of holding a gold bar in your hand versus storing it in someone else's vault.

Lowering Costs and Increasing Speed

The traditional financial system is filled with intermediaries—banks, payment processors, and clearinghouses—that all take a cut and slow things down. This is especially true for international payments, which can be expensive and take several business days to settle. Cryptocurrencies, built on a decentralized network, remove many of these middlemen. This allows for transactions to be sent directly from person to person, often with significantly lower fees and a settlement time of minutes, not days. The network operates 24/7, 365 days a year, with no "banking hours."

Unprecedented Transparency

Most cryptocurrencies operate on a public blockchain, which is a shared, immutable record of every transaction that has ever occurred. While your real-world identity is not tied to your wallet address, the flow of funds is completely transparent and auditable by anyone in the world. This is a dramatic shift from the traditional financial system, where transactions happen behind the closed doors of private institutions. This transparency builds a different kind of trust—trust in the verifiable record of the network itself.

Access for Everyone: Promoting Financial Inclusion

Globally, billions of people are "unbanked" or "underbanked," meaning they lack access to basic financial services. To open a bank account, you typically need a fixed address, a government ID, and a minimum deposit. To participate in the cryptocurrency economy, you only need one thing: an internet connection. Anyone, anywhere, can download a wallet and receive funds, giving them access to a global financial system without needing permission from a central authority.

A Potential Hedge Against Inflation

A key benefit of certain cryptocurrencies, most notably Bitcoin, is their fixed and predictable supply. There will only ever be 21 million Bitcoin created. This is in stark contrast to traditional fiat currencies, which central banks can print in unlimited quantities, potentially devaluing the currency and your savings through inflation. For this reason, many investors view Bitcoin as a form of "digital gold"—a scarce asset that can potentially act as a hedge against currency debasement.

A Balanced Perspective: Understanding the Risks

It is crucial to be a responsible investor and acknowledge that these benefits come with significant risks and responsibilities. The freedom of self-custody means you are solely responsible for your security. The markets are notoriously volatile, and the technology is still new and evolving.

After learning about the powerful technology of MultiversX and its ambitious vision for the metaverse, you've likely arrived at the most important question: is EGLD a good investment? This is the ultimate question for any potential investor, but the honest answer is that there is no crystal ball. No one can definitively predict the future of any asset.

Instead of offering a simple "yes" or "no," a responsible expert provides a balanced framework to help you make your own informed decision. This guide will walk you through the bull case (the reasons for optimism) and the bear case (the potential risks) for MultiversX.

The Bull Case: Why EGLD Could Succeed

The arguments for a long-term investment in EGLD are compelling and center on three key areas. First is its foundational technology. The blockchain's "Adaptive State Sharding" architecture is genuinely innovative, allowing it to be incredibly fast, scalable, and cheap to use. This gives it a significant technical advantage. Second is its clear and ambitious vision. The pivot to MultiversX and the development of the [xPortal App] represent a focused bet on the future of Web3 and the metaverse. If this trend achieves mass adoption, MultiversX is well-positioned to be a central player. Finally, the project benefits from a dedicated development team and a passionate community that has supported its growth for years, providing a solid social foundation.

The Bear Case: The Risks and Challenges Ahead

Conversely, a responsible investor must consider the significant hurdles MultiversX faces. The most formidable of these is the intense competition. The Layer 1 blockchain space is the most crowded and competitive arena in all of crypto, with MultiversX fighting for market share against giants like Ethereum, Solana, and Avalanche. Furthermore, its success is now heavily tied to the "metaverse" narrative. If this trend fails to capture the public's imagination or takes longer than expected to mature, the project could struggle to maintain relevance. Ultimately, even the best technology is worthless without adoption. The project's long-term value is entirely dependent on its ability to attract a critical mass of developers, projects, and daily active users to its ecosystem, which remains a monumental challenge.

How to Frame Your Decision

An investment in EGLD should be viewed as a venture capital-style bet on a specific, high-tech vision for the future of the internet. It is not a "blue-chip" asset like Bitcoin, but rather a high-potential project with correspondingly high risks. The decision to invest should depend on your personal risk tolerance and your belief in the team's ability to compete in a crowded market and successfully execute their metaverse strategy. Before making any decision, ensure you have a complete understanding of the project's fundamentals, as detailed in our main guide: [What Is Elrond (MultiversX)? A Guide to EGLD Crypto].

Your Next Step

Thorough research is the bedrock of any sound investment. Continue to follow the project's progress, monitor the growth of the xPortal app, and stay informed about the broader market trends. If, after completing your own due diligence, you decide that EGLD aligns with your investment goals, you will need a secure and reliable platform to act on that decision.

Key Takeaways:

• Traditional banking excludes billions of people while cryptocurrencies offer universal access to the global economy.
• Digital assets provide a hedge against inflation when central banks print excessive amounts of fiat money.
• Decentralization ensures that your wealth cannot be censored or frozen by any single authority.

Cryptocurrencies have fundamentally changed the way we think about value and ownership. For many people in developed nations they might seem like just another speculative asset class similar to stocks or commodities. However for the majority of the global population they represent a vital technological breakthrough that solves deep systemic problems.

The legacy financial system is slow and expensive. It is also surprisingly exclusive. We need a new system that operates on the internet standard of being open and permissionless. This technology is not just about getting rich but about fixing the broken plumbing of the global economy.

Why Is Financial Inclusion Critical?

The most obvious need for cryptocurrencies stems from the failure of traditional banking. According to the World Bank roughly 1.4 billion adults remain unbanked. These people have no access to savings accounts or credit cards.

This is usually because they lack the necessary paperwork or live in regions where building bank branches is not profitable. Digital assets solve this immediately. Anyone with a smartphone can create a wallet in seconds.

This capability empowers entrepreneurs in developing nations to participate in global commerce. A freelancer in Nigeria can receive payment from a client in New York instantly without losing 10 percent to remittance fees. This levels the playing field for the global workforce.

How Do They Protect Against Inflation?

Another major driver for cryptocurrencies is the loss of trust in fiat money. Central banks control the supply of currencies like the Dollar or the Euro. When governments print money to fund debt it dilutes the savings of everyday citizens through inflation.

Bitcoin and other digital assets are often designed with a fixed supply cap. There will only ever be 21 million Bitcoin. This mathematical scarcity acts as a shield against the devaluation of fiat currency.

In countries with hyperinflation like Venezuela or Argentina people do not buy digital tokens to speculate. They buy them to survive. They need a store of value that their government cannot devalue overnight.

Can They Prevent Censorship?

We live in an era where financial deplatforming is becoming a weapon. Banks can freeze accounts based on political pressure or arbitrary rules. Cryptocurrencies offer a solution known as censorship resistance.

Because the network is decentralized there is no CEO to call and no server to shut down. If you hold your own private keys nobody can stop you from sending or receiving value.

This property is essential for human rights activists and journalists operating in oppressive regimes. It ensures that money remains personal property rather than a permissioned privilege granted by the state.

Are They More Efficient Than Banks?

The final argument for cryptocurrencies is pure efficiency. Sending money internationally via the SWIFT banking system takes days and involves multiple intermediaries. Each middleman takes a cut.

Blockchain transactions operate 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. They settle in minutes or seconds regardless of borders. This speed allows for new business models like micropayments and automated streaming money that were impossible with the old infrastructure.

Conclusion

The world does not just want cryptocurrencies it effectively needs them. They provide a necessary upgrade to a financial system that was built before the internet existed. By prioritizing inclusion and sovereignty this technology builds a fairer future for everyone.