List of questions about [Cryptocurrency News]

Blockchain Firm Sets Sights on $200 Million Water Tokenization Push Across Asia

A growing intersection between blockchain innovation and real-world infrastructure is taking shape in Southeast Asia, as a blockchain infrastructure company prepares to bring water assets on-chain in a deal that could redefine how essential resources are financed in emerging markets.

Global Settlement Network, a firm specializing in blockchain-based settlement infrastructure, has unveiled plans to tokenize water treatment facilities in Indonesia, with ambitions that extend far beyond a single pilot. The initiative signals a broader shift toward using blockchain technology to unlock capital for large-scale public infrastructure projects that have traditionally struggled to attract investment.

Turning Water Infrastructure Into Digital Assets

The project begins in Jakarta, where multiple government-linked water treatment sites are being prepared for tokenization. By converting physical infrastructure into blockchain-based assets, the initiative aims to make water projects investable at a global scale, opening the door to a new class of investors who may otherwise have limited access to such opportunities.

The initial phase is designed to mobilize tens of millions of dollars to modernize aging facilities, improve treatment efficiency and expand access to clean water across densely populated areas. These digital representations of infrastructure assets will allow capital to move faster and with greater transparency compared to traditional funding routes.

Tokenization, in this context, does not merely represent ownership. It introduces programmable settlement, real-time auditing and enhanced liquidity, features that could dramatically lower barriers to infrastructure investment across developing economies.

Stablecoins and Local Currency Settlement Trials

An important component of the rollout involves testing blockchain-based settlement using local-currency stablecoins. The project partners plan to experiment with controlled payment corridors that allow transactions to settle efficiently while maintaining regulatory oversight.

By integrating rupiah-pegged stablecoins into the settlement layer, the initiative aims to reduce friction in cross-border financing and demonstrate how blockchain rails can coexist with local financial systems. Once validated, the model could expand to additional currency corridors across Southeast Asia.

This approach reflects a growing recognition that blockchain adoption in emerging markets often succeeds when it aligns closely with local monetary frameworks rather than attempting to bypass them.

Scaling Toward a $200 Million Regional Vision

While Jakarta serves as the testing ground, the long-term objective is significantly larger. Following the pilot, the firms involved intend to expand the model across multiple Southeast Asian countries, with a cumulative target of approximately $200 million in tokenized water-related assets.

Infrastructure specialists involved in the project argue that Southeast Asia is uniquely positioned for such innovation due to its rapid urbanization, increasing demand for clean water and openness to digital financial solutions. If successful, the model could be replicated across other forms of infrastructure, including energy, transport and waste management.

Closing the Infrastructure Funding Gap

Across Southeast Asia, water infrastructure faces a mounting financing challenge. Population growth, climate pressures and urban expansion are driving demand far faster than public budgets can accommodate. Industry estimates suggest trillions of dollars in long-term investment will be required over the coming decades to prevent severe water shortages and system failures.

Tokenization offers an alternative pathway by connecting global capital directly with real-world needs. By fractionalizing large infrastructure projects into blockchain-based assets, funding can be sourced from a wider pool of investors while maintaining accountability through on-chain transparency.

Executives involved in the initiative believe this structure could help bridge long-standing funding gaps, particularly in markets where foreign investment has been limited by regulatory complexity or currency risk.

Real-World Assets Poised for a Breakout Year

The water tokenization project arrives at a time when interest in real-world asset tokenization is accelerating across the crypto industry. Market observers expect this sector to expand sharply in 2026, driven by use cases that extend beyond traditional crypto-native audiences.

Tokenized assets tied to tangible value such as infrastructure, commodities and real estate are increasingly viewed as a way to bring stability and utility to blockchain markets. With billions of dollars in real-world assets already represented on-chain, the sector is moving from experimentation toward institutional-scale deployment.

Emerging economies, in particular, are seen as fertile ground for this growth, as they seek innovative ways to attract capital without over-reliance on conventional financing mechanisms.

Southeast Asia’s Crypto Momentum Adds Fuel

Southeast Asia is already one of the most active regions for blockchain adoption, with Indonesia standing out as a major hub for on-chain activity. Rapid growth in digital asset usage, combined with a young, tech-savvy population, has created an environment where blockchain-based infrastructure solutions are gaining traction.

This existing momentum may prove crucial to the success of large-scale tokenization projects. As governments, investors and technology providers become more familiar with blockchain applications, initiatives like tokenized water infrastructure could move from niche experiments to mainstream financial tools.

A Blueprint for Blockchain-Powered Infrastructure

If the Jakarta pilot delivers on its promises, it could serve as a blueprint for how blockchain technology can support essential public services at scale. Beyond financial returns, proponents argue that tokenization can introduce greater transparency, efficiency and accountability into infrastructure development.

As blockchain continues to evolve beyond speculative use cases, projects that address real-world challenges such as water access may define the next phase of adoption. For Southeast Asia, the tokenization of water infrastructure could mark the beginning of a broader transformation in how vital resources are funded and managed in the digital age.

Crypto Industry Divided Over CLARITY Act as Coinbase Withdraws Support

The U.S. crypto industry finds itself at a crossroads as the controversial CLARITY Act faces renewed scrutiny in Washington. Tensions are rising between crypto executives and lawmakers, revealing a sharp split on how best to regulate digital assets while fostering innovation. The debate comes amid the high-profile withdrawal of support from Coinbase, the nation’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, which cited serious concerns about the bill’s current draft.

Coinbase Breaks Ranks

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong made headlines when he publicly stated that his firm could not support the legislation in its present form. Armstrong outlined a series of issues he said made the bill  materially worse than the current status quo.  Key concerns included restrictions on tokenized equities, potential prohibitions on DeFi platforms, expansive government access to financial records, and measures that could undermine privacy and innovation. He emphasized that the draft’s treatment of stablecoin rewards and banking competition also posed serious risks to the ecosystem.

While Armstrong acknowledged the Senate’s efforts to craft a bipartisan compromise, he stressed that  we’d rather have no bill than a bad bill,  signaling that Coinbase will not lend its backing until the legislation better aligns with industry needs.

Supporters Still See Progress

Despite Coinbase’s withdrawal, other crypto leaders remain cautiously optimistic. Chris Dixon, managing partner at a16z Crypto, noted that the bill lays the foundation for clear regulatory guidance, which the industry has long sought. Dixon highlighted that both major political parties and previous administrations have worked with crypto innovators to safeguard decentralization, protect developers, and provide fair opportunities for entrepreneurs. He believes that, while imperfect, the CLARITY Act could help the U.S. maintain its leadership in digital asset innovation.

Peter Van Valkenburgh, executive director of Coin Center, echoed this sentiment, stating that the current draft “represents a positive step forward” and expressed hope that further amendments would strengthen the bill while protecting innovation and investor rights.

Lawmakers Face Industry Pushback

The Senate Banking Committee’s delay in marking up the CLARITY Act reflects the complexity of balancing regulatory clarity with the needs of the fast-growing digital asset sector. Lawmakers must navigate divergent perspectives, with some executives advocating for stricter rules to protect consumers, while others, like Coinbase, fear that overly restrictive measures could stifle innovation and drive crypto activity offshore.

Industry lawyers and venture capitalists have weighed in on both sides. Jake Chervinsky, a prominent crypto attorney, emphasized that markup sessions and Senate floor debates offer opportunities to refine the legislation, and urged stakeholders to push for the “best possible version” rather than abandoning efforts altogether. Meanwhile, Tim Draper, veteran venture capitalist, sided with Armstrong, warning that the compromise, as currently written, appears heavily influenced by banking interests and could be worse than no legislation at all.

Market Reaction and Bitcoin Resilience

Despite the political turmoil, cryptocurrency markets appear largely unfazed. Bitcoin’s recent price movements demonstrate resilience, with the flagship asset topping $97,600 before cooling slightly. Industry insiders note that digital assets often anticipate regulatory outcomes, pricing in potential market changes ahead of official decisions.

Gracie Lin, CEO of OKX Singapore, pointed out that Bitcoin’s rally coincides with renewed demand for spot ETFs, growing liquidity, and optimism that a clearer regulatory framework could stabilize U.S. digital asset markets. She highlighted three critical factors for the market moving forward: how the CLARITY Act evolves through the Senate Banking Committee, the resilience of spot ETF flows, and the Federal Reserve’s late-January meeting, which could either support or reset financial conditions.

The Road Ahead for U.S. Crypto Regulation

The CLARITY Act controversy underscores the delicate balance lawmakers face in regulating a rapidly evolving sector. On one hand, clear rules of the road are essential for fostering innovation and attracting investment. On the other, missteps could inadvertently stifle the very technologies the U.S. hopes to lead globally. As debates continue, the crypto community watches closely, aware that the final outcome could shape the industry’s trajectory for years to come.

The divide between Coinbase and other crypto leaders highlights the stakes involved. Whether the CLARITY Act emerges as a transformative framework or a cautionary tale, it is clear that regulatory decisions in Washington will have far-reaching implications for investors, developers, and users alike.

Ethereum’s Network Explosion Raises New Security Questions

Ethereum has recently witnessed an unprecedented surge in on-chain activity, with transaction counts and active addresses reaching record-breaking levels. At first glance, this spike appears to signal renewed adoption, rising user confidence, and growing interest across decentralized finance and Web3 applications. However, new research suggests the story behind these numbers may be far more concerning.

Crypto Treasury Buying Is Absorbing Bitcoin Faster Than It’s Being Mined

Bitcoin’s supply dynamics are entering a new phase, and this time, corporations are at the center of it. Over the past six months, corporate crypto treasuries have accumulated Bitcoin at a pace that dramatically exceeds new issuance, creating a growing imbalance between demand and freshly mined supply. The numbers reveal a powerful shift in how Bitcoin is being adopted, not by retail traders chasing short-term gains, but by institutions locking BTC onto balance sheets for the long term.

US Crypto Policy Freeze Reignites DeFi, DAO and Governance Tensions

The US crypto industry has entered another period of regulatory hesitation, and the pause is echoing far beyond Washington. As lawmakers delay progress on comprehensive crypto legislation, debates around decentralized finance, developer liability and onchain governance are resurfacing with renewed intensity. The delay has not slowed innovation, but it has sharpened the fault lines between regulators, builders and investors who disagree on how decentralization should be treated under US law.

At the center of the discussion is the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, commonly referred to as the CLARITY Act. Designed to define the boundaries between securities, commodities and decentralized protocols, the bill was expected to bring long-awaited structure to US crypto markets. Instead, a sudden pause in legislative momentum has reignited fears that decentralized systems may once again be forced into regulatory frameworks built for centralized intermediaries.

Why the CLARITY Act Delay Matters More Than It Appears

The postponement of the CLARITY Act is not simply a scheduling issue. For many in the crypto sector, it represents another reminder that the United States still lacks a unified vision for regulating digital assets. While enforcement actions continue, the absence of clear statutory definitions leaves developers and platforms operating in a state of legal ambiguity.

DeFi leaders argue that the current draft of the bill does not sufficiently protect builders of decentralized infrastructure. Concerns have grown that developers, DAO contributors or even node operators could be exposed to compliance obligations such as KYC implementation or registration requirements originally designed for centralized financial institutions.

This uncertainty has triggered renewed pushback from venture firms, protocol teams and advocacy groups who warn that misapplied regulation could chill open-source development and drive innovation offshore.

DeFi Developers Push Back Against Centralized Assumptions

A core issue driving the debate is the mismatch between decentralized systems and traditional regulatory logic. DeFi protocols operate without centralized control, yet many proposed amendments to US crypto legislation still assume the presence of an accountable intermediary.

Industry voices argue that imposing centralized compliance obligations on decentralized networks misunderstands how these systems function. Smart contracts execute automatically, governance is often distributed, and infrastructure is frequently permissionless. Treating such systems like traditional brokers or exchanges risks undermining their core design.

As a result, many DeFi teams are reassessing how they build, deploy and govern protocols in the US market. Some are exploring jurisdictional diversification, while others are redesigning governance frameworks to better withstand regulatory scrutiny.

Rethinking DAO Governance in a High-Stakes Regulatory Era

The regulatory pause has also sparked deeper reflection on DAO governance itself. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin recently reignited discussion around the structural weaknesses of many DAOs, arguing that token-based voting systems have failed to deliver meaningful governance improvements.

According to this view, DAOs have become overly dependent on passive token voting, resulting in low participation, decision fatigue and disproportionate influence from large holders. These weaknesses are not just governance issues; they become regulatory vulnerabilities when authorities seek clear accountability.

The next generation of DAOs may need to evolve beyond treasury management and voting mechanics. Purpose-built governance systems focused on dispute resolution, protocol upgrades and long-term stewardship could offer more resilience, both technically and legally.

Governance Experiments Gain Momentum Across DeFi

As regulatory pressure mounts, DeFi protocols are actively experimenting with new governance models. Some projects are moving away from rigid lock-up tokens and complex voting structures in favor of more liquid, accessible governance participation.

These shifts are driven by practical realities. Low engagement weakens decentralization, and weak decentralization strengthens the case for regulatory intervention. By lowering barriers to participation and aligning incentives more effectively, protocols aim to reinforce their decentralized nature rather than dilute it.

This evolution reflects a broader realization within DeFi: governance design is no longer an internal matter. It is a critical interface between decentralized technology and regulatory expectations.

Regulators Face Pressure Over Self-Custody and DeFi Boundaries

While lawmakers pause, pressure is building on regulators to clarify how self-custody and DeFi activity should be treated under future market structure rules. Recent submissions to US regulators have highlighted the risk of overbroad definitions that could inadvertently restrict user rights or misclassify decentralized activity.

Self-custody remains a foundational principle of crypto, yet its treatment under US law remains unsettled. Industry advocates argue that protecting self-custody is essential not only for user autonomy but also for preserving the security model of decentralized systems.

At the same time, regulators are under pressure to balance innovation with investor protection, especially as DeFi protocols grow in size and complexity.

How Global Platforms Adapt to Regulatory Uncertainty

In this environment, global crypto platforms are adapting by prioritizing flexibility, transparency and multi-jurisdictional readiness. Exchanges and trading platforms increasingly design products that can operate under different regulatory assumptions, adjusting offerings by region while maintaining consistent risk controls.

Deus X Ceo Tim Grant: Integrating Finance, Not Replacing It

A Different Kind of Crypto Leader

In an industry often dominated by bold promises to overthrow traditional finance, Tim Grant stands apart. As CEO of Deus X Capital, Grant is not interested in disruption for the sake of disruption. His vision is more pragmatic, more grounded, and ultimately more ambitious: to merge the efficiency of blockchain technology with the stability and scale of global financial markets. As digital assets continue to mature, Grant’s approach reflects a broader shift in the industry—from experimentation to execution, from speculation to infrastructure.

From Traditional Finance to Digital Assets

Tim Grant’s journey into crypto did not begin with Bitcoin maximalism or ideological opposition to banks. In fact, when he first encountered the digital asset space in 2015, he had no technical background in blockchain at all. What changed everything was a series of early meetings in San Francisco with executive teams at Ripple and Coinbase. Those conversations revealed something deeper than price charts and tokens: a new financial toolkit capable of fixing long-standing inefficiencies in global markets.

Grant quickly recognized blockchain’s potential to improve settlement speeds, reduce operational costs, and increase transparency across financial systems. Crucially, he did not see these benefits as a replacement for traditional finance, but as a natural extension of it. By the end of 2015, he had fully committed to the digital asset space, a decision that would define the next chapter of his career.

The Birth of Deus X Capital

Deus X Capital emerged as a unique hybrid between an investment firm and an operating company. Backed by a family office and launched with approximately one billion dollars in assets, the firm was designed to go beyond passive investing. With a global footprint spanning London, Malta, and the United Arab Emirates, Deus X operates at the intersection of capital markets, fintech, and digital assets.

Rather than chasing trends, the firm focuses on building long-term financial infrastructure. Its mandate is clear: unlock value across regulated digital finance while contributing to a fairer and more accessible financial system. This dual identity—as both investor and operator—has become the cornerstone of its strategy.

An Infrastructure-Led Growth Strategy

At the heart of Deus X’s philosophy is a deliberately hands-on, infrastructure-first approach. Grant believes that true value creation in digital finance comes from owning and operating the rails, not just funding companies that use them. By combining capital deployment with direct operational involvement, Deus X aims to achieve stronger execution and more resilient, risk-adjusted returns.

This strategy spans multiple layers of the digital finance stack. From payments and treasury solutions to prime services, market infrastructure, execution tools, and institutional decentralized finance, Deus X positions itself wherever regulated digital finance meets real-world demand. The result is an ecosystem where investments are not isolated bets, but interconnected components of a larger financial machine.

Building an Interconnected Venture Ecosystem

Deus X’s growing portfolio reflects this ecosystem-driven mindset. Businesses such as Deus X Pay, Cor Prime, and Solstice are designed to solve specific market challenges while sharing underlying infrastructure and strategic direction. Rather than competing internally, these ventures reinforce one another, allowing growth to compound organically.

This model enables Deus X to move faster than traditional investment firms while maintaining regulatory discipline. Each venture benefits from shared expertise, technology, and capital, creating efficiencies that would be difficult to achieve in a fragmented portfolio.

Why Regulation and Institutions Matter

For Grant, the future of digital assets depends on meaningful engagement with institutions and regulators. He is outspoken about the need to move beyond hype and focus on production-ready systems that can operate within existing legal frameworks. Payments, treasury management, tokenization, prime brokerage, and institutional DeFi are not theoretical concepts in his world—they are active areas of deployment.

This emphasis on regulation does not limit innovation; instead, it enables scale. By building compliant infrastructure from the ground up, Deus X positions itself as a bridge between traditional finance and the next generation of digital financial services.

Consensus Hong Kong: Substance Over Spectacle

Grant’s upcoming appearance at Consensus Hong Kong reflects his broader philosophy. He has made it clear that he is not interested in buzzwords or surface-level conversations. His focus is on what he calls  real talk only —honest discussions about what is working, what is not, and what it will take to bring digital finance into full-scale production.

With exposure across investing, venture building, and direct operations, Grant brings a rare, holistic perspective to the stage. His message is aimed at builders, regulators, and institutional players who are serious about deploying digital finance in the real world.

The Long-Term Vision for Digital Finance

Tim Grant’s vision for Deus X is ultimately about integration. He does not believe the future lies in tearing down existing financial systems, but in upgrading them. Blockchain, in his view, is not an enemy of traditional finance—it is a powerful enhancement.

As the digital asset industry matures, voices like Grant’s are becoming increasingly influential. By prioritizing infrastructure, regulation, and collaboration, Deus X represents a model of how crypto can evolve from a disruptive force into a foundational layer of global finance. In a space often driven by noise, Grant’s message is clear, measured, and increasingly hard to ignore.

Crypto’s Next Defining Battle: Privacy in a World Built on Transparency

The cryptocurrency industry is approaching a decisive crossroads. As blockchain technology moves steadily from niche experimentation into banks, payment networks and even state-backed financial systems, a fundamental contradiction is becoming impossible to ignore: public ledgers were never designed for mass financial privacy.

For years, transparency has been celebrated as one of crypto’s greatest strengths. Every transaction can be verified, traced and audited by anyone. Yet as institutional adoption accelerates, that same transparency is emerging as a critical weakness. Financial systems do not scale when every payment, transfer and business relationship is exposed to the entire world.

This tension is now shaping what many experts believe will be crypto’s next major structural battle — the fight to reconcile privacy with public blockchain design.

Why Financial Privacy Matters More Than Ever

In traditional finance, transactions are not anonymous, but they are also not publicly broadcast. Banks, payment processors and regulators can access data when necessary, but everyday financial activity is shielded from competitors, criminals and casual observers.

Public blockchains break this norm entirely. Every movement of funds is visible by default, creating an environment where sensitive financial behavior can be analyzed, mapped and exploited. While individual users may tolerate this in limited cases, institutions cannot.

Corporations rely on confidentiality. Banks depend on discretion. Governments require controlled access to data rather than full exposure. When transaction histories become permanently public, risks multiply — from corporate espionage to personal security threats.

This growing discomfort explains why privacy is no longer a fringe concern. It has become a central requirement for crypto’s survival as a global financial infrastructure.

Institutional Adoption Is Accelerating the Conflict

Banks and payment companies are actively testing blockchain-based settlement systems. Tokenized assets, on-chain payments and programmable money promise efficiency, speed and automation far beyond legacy infrastructure.

However, few institutions are willing to conduct routine financial activity on open ledgers where competitors can infer business strategies, cash flows or supplier relationships. Transparency that benefits auditors becomes a liability when it exposes proprietary data.

This is where the clash intensifies. Blockchain’s core architecture prioritizes openness, while real-world finance depends on selective visibility. Without a credible privacy layer, large-scale adoption faces a hard ceiling.

Zero-Knowledge Proofs: A Promising but Unfinished Solution

Privacy-preserving technologies, particularly zero-knowledge proofs, are widely seen as the most viable compromise. ZK systems allow transactions or identities to be verified without revealing the underlying data. In theory, this enables compliance without mass surveillance.

Instead of broadcasting everything, users could prove they meet regulatory requirements while keeping sensitive details hidden. This mirrors how the existing financial system operates, where information is available to authorized parties but invisible to the public.

Despite years of discussion and technical progress, real-world adoption remains limited. Major exchanges rarely use ZK technology for identity verification. Large financial institutions remain cautious. The tools exist, but deployment at scale has lagged behind the promise.

The Regulator’s Chicken-and-Egg Dilemma

Regulators are no longer dismissing privacy technology outright. Many policymakers now understand how zero-knowledge systems work and recognize their potential. The hesitation lies elsewhere.

Supervisors want proof that these tools can function reliably under real-world conditions, at national or even global scale. They want to see how enforcement, audits and investigations would work in practice before granting regulatory approval.

The industry, however, needs regulatory clarity to deploy these systems in the first place. Without clear rules, few companies are willing to take the risk of implementing privacy technology that may later be deemed non-compliant.

This creates a classic chicken-and-egg problem. Regulators want evidence before approval, while developers need approval before deployment.

CBDCs and the Surveillance Question

Central bank digital currencies bring the privacy debate into sharp focus. Unlike private blockchains or payment platforms, CBDCs place governments directly at the center of digital money flows.

Wholesale CBDCs, used only by banks and financial institutions, largely resemble existing settlement systems and raise limited public concern. The real controversy surrounds retail CBDCs, where individual transactions could be monitored, stored and analyzed at unprecedented scale.

Different regions illustrate different priorities. China’s digital yuan aligns with an already expansive surveillance framework, offering authorities broad visibility into transactions. European policymakers, by contrast, emphasize that a digital euro would protect user privacy.

The challenge is that privacy cannot be guaranteed by statements alone. Design choices determine who controls access, how exceptions are handled and whether safeguards can withstand future political pressure.

CBDCs are not just new payment tools. They are stress tests for how much financial data states are willing to collect and retain in the digital age.

Privacy Does Not Mean Total Secrecy

One of the biggest misconceptions in this debate is the idea that privacy equals anonymity. In reality, financial privacy is about control, not invisibility.

Most users accept that banks, intermediaries and law enforcement can access transaction data when justified. What they reject is universal exposure — a system where everyone can see everything all the time.

Public blockchains push transparency beyond what societies are accustomed to. Centralized digital systems risk concentrating too much power over data in a single authority. Both extremes create problems.

The challenge is finding a middle ground where transactions are private by default, auditable when necessary and protected against abuse over time.

Early Movers Are Shaping the Future

Despite regulatory uncertainty, some projects are moving ahead. Privacy-focused platforms and research groups are actively developing zero-knowledge systems that enable selective disclosure rather than full concealment.

These efforts aim to preserve blockchain’s benefits — auditability, programmability and trust minimization — while restoring financial norms that users and institutions expect.

Policy groups are also engaging regulators, arguing that privacy technology can support compliance with data protection laws rather than undermine them. In Europe, zero-knowledge proofs are already being studied in the context of digital identity and regulatory frameworks.

The Outcome Will Define Crypto’s Role in Finance

The future of crypto will not be decided by price cycles alone. It will be shaped by whether the industry can solve the privacy paradox at its core.

A system that exposes everything cannot support global finance. A system that hides everything cannot satisfy regulators. The next phase of crypto must bridge that gap.

Privacy is no longer optional. It is the next battleground — and how it is resolved will determine whether blockchain becomes a foundational layer of the financial system or remains a limited experiment on the margins.

Galaxy Prepares $100 Million Hedge Fund as Crypto Markets Enter a New Era

Galaxy Digital is stepping into a new phase of crypto investing with the planned launch of a $100 million hedge fund designed to profit from both rising and falling markets. As the era of uninterrupted upside in digital assets shows signs of fading, the firm is positioning itself to capitalize on volatility rather than momentum alone.

The fund, expected to debut in the first quarter of the year, reflects a broader shift in how institutional players approach crypto. Instead of relying on a bullish market cycle, Galaxy aims to deploy a flexible strategy that embraces uncertainty and structural change across both digital assets and traditional financial markets.

A Long-Short Strategy Built for Volatility

Unlike earlier crypto-focused funds that depended heavily on price appreciation, Galaxy’s new hedge fund will actively take long and short positions. This approach allows the fund to generate returns whether prices move higher or lower, a structure increasingly favored as markets mature and speculative excess cools.

Roughly thirty percent of the fund’s capital will be allocated directly to crypto tokens, while the remaining assets will be invested in publicly traded companies tied to financial infrastructure. These include firms influenced by digital asset regulation, blockchain integration, payments innovation, and data-driven financial services.

According to reports, Galaxy has already secured the full $100 million in commitments from family offices, high-net-worth individuals, and select institutional investors. The firm itself will also seed the fund, signaling internal confidence in the strategy, although the exact amount has not been disclosed.

The End of Crypto’s  Up-Only  Phase

Joe Armao, who will oversee the fund, believes the crypto market is transitioning into a more complex phase. He argues that the period where prices moved predominantly higher is likely coming to an end, replaced by an environment where selectivity, risk management, and active positioning matter far more.

Despite this shift, Galaxy remains optimistic about major blockchain networks. Ethereum and Solana continue to be viewed as structurally strong assets with long-term relevance, particularly as decentralized finance, tokenization, and onchain infrastructure evolve. Bitcoin also remains central to Galaxy’s outlook, especially in a macroeconomic setting where potential US Federal Reserve rate cuts could reshape investor appetite for alternative assets.

Armao has noted that Bitcoin’s role as a macro hedge could persist as long as traditional markets such as equities and gold maintain relative stability.

Watching Wall Street Alongside Web3

Galaxy’s strategy extends beyond crypto-native companies. The firm is closely monitoring traditional financial stocks that are being reshaped by regulation, blockchain adoption, and artificial intelligence. Recent sell-offs in payment processors and financial data companies have created opportunities that Galaxy believes are being misunderstood by the market.

Companies like Fiserv, which sit at the intersection of payments and data infrastructure, are experiencing valuation pressure as investors reassess their future roles in a digitized financial system. Galaxy sees these shifts not as risks, but as entry points for long-term positioning.

Market Pullbacks Create Strategic Openings

The launch of the fund comes amid a notable cooling in the crypto market. Bitcoin has fallen roughly thirty percent from its October peak and is currently trading near the $90,000 level. Over the past year, the asset is down approximately twelve percent, reflecting broader risk-off sentiment across digital markets.

Zcash Developers Exit Electric Coin Company in Major Governance Rift, Prepare to Launch New Independent Firm

The team responsible for developing one of the crypto industry’s most well-known privacy-focused blockchains has officially parted ways with its long-time organizational home. Developers behind Zcash have left the Electric Coin Company, signaling a dramatic internal rupture that underscores ongoing tensions around governance, decentralization, and control within open-source crypto projects.