List of questions about [Blockchain]

You’ve learned that staking is one of the most popular ways to earn passive income on your crypto assets. The concept is powerful: by locking up your coins, you help secure a network and get rewarded for it. This immediately leads to the most important question for any investor: which staking coins should I choose?

The crypto market offers thousands of options, and it can be overwhelming. As your guide, I'm not going to give you a "hot tip" on a single coin. Instead, I'm going to teach you how to think in categories. Understanding the major types of staking coins will empower you to make smarter, more strategic decisions for your portfolio.

Category 1: Layer 1 Blockchain Coins (The "Blue-Chips")

This is the most important and well-established category of staking coins. Layer 1s are the foundational blockchains—the digital highways upon which the rest of the crypto world is built. When you stake a Layer 1 coin, you are participating directly in the security and consensus of the entire network. These are generally considered the "blue-chip" assets of the staking world.

• Example: Ethereum (ETH): As the largest smart contract platform, staking ETH is the bedrock of the staking ecosystem. It is a bet on the long-term success of the entire decentralized application space.
• Example: Solana (SOL) or Cardano (ADA): These are other major Layer 1s, each with its own unique technology and community. Staking these coins supports their respective ecosystems and is a bet on their ability to compete for market share.

Staking Layer 1 coins is a vote of confidence in the fundamental infrastructure of Web3.

Category 2: DeFi Governance Tokens

The next major category comes from the world of Decentralized Finance (DeFi). Many of the largest DeFi applications—like decentralized exchanges or lending platforms—have their own native tokens. While some of these can be staked for a share of the platform's revenue, a primary use case is "governance." By staking these tokens, you often gain the right to vote on important proposals that shape the future of the protocol.

• Example: Uniswap (UNI) or Curve (CRV): Staking tokens from these top decentralized exchanges can give you a voice in their governance.
• Why it's different: The reward here is not just financial; it's also about having influence over a key piece of the DeFi ecosystem.

How to Choose a Good Staking Coin: A 3-Point Checklist

Regardless of the category, you must do your own research. Here is a simple framework to evaluate any potential staking coin:

1. Look Beyond the APY: An extremely high Annual Percentage Yield (APY) can be a red flag. It might be fueled by high token inflation, which can devalue your rewards over time. A sustainable yield from a strong project is often better than a risky, triple-digit APY.
2. Analyze the Network's Health: Is the project actually being used? Look for metrics like daily active users, transaction volume, and a growing number of developers. A healthy, active network is more likely to be a good long-term bet.
3. Understand the Token's Utility: What is the coin used for besides staking? A strong staking coin should have a clear purpose within its ecosystem, whether it's paying for transaction fees (like ETH) or governing a protocol (like UNI).

Your First Step: Acquiring the Assets

Staking is a powerful strategy for long-term investors, but your journey always begins with the first crucial step: acquiring the right assets. Before you can stake anything, you need to buy the coins on a secure and reliable platform.

Hey there, just when you thought you had your head around Layer 1s like Ethereum and Layer 2s like Arbitrum, a new term starts popping up: Layer 3.

If you're feeling a bit of whiplash, I completely understand. The crypto space moves incredibly fast, and it can feel like the goalposts are always shifting. You might be wondering, "Do we really need another layer? What does this one even do?"

Let's break it down. Understanding Layer 3s is like getting a sneak peek at the next chapter of the crypto story, and it's actually a very exciting development.

A Simple Analogy: From Highways to Private Roads

To understand Layer 3, let's quickly recap the first two layers with an analogy:

• Layer 1 (like Ethereum): This is a massive, highly secure global highway system. It's incredibly robust, but because everyone wants to use it, it can get congested and expensive.
• Layer 2 (like Arbitrum or Optimism): These are like high-speed express lanes built on top of the main highway. They take a huge amount of traffic, process it quickly and cheaply in batches, and then post a summary back to the Layer 1 highway for final security.

So, what is a Layer 3? A Layer 3 is like a specialized, private road or even a dedicated racetrack that connects to one of the high-speed express lanes (the L2). It is a hyper-specialized chain built on top of a Layer 2.

So, Why Do We Even Need Layer 3s?

The purpose of a Layer 3 is hyper-customization. Think about it: a high-frequency trading application has completely different needs than a fantasy role-playing game. A general-purpose Layer 2 has to serve both of them. This is where L3s come in. A developer can create their own Layer 3 that is perfectly tailored for their specific application.

This customization unlocks three incredible benefits:

1. Massive Scalability: A game might have millions of tiny, in-game actions (like picking up an item or casting a spell). These are not valuable financial transactions, and it would be far too expensive to put them all on a general L2. An L3 can be built to handle this massive volume of specific actions for next to nothing.
2. Custom Features: The developer can design the L3 exactly how they want. They could decide that users don't need to pay gas fees at all inside their application. They could use a custom token for gas or even create their own specialized privacy features.
3. Cheaper Costs: Because the L3 settles its transactions in big batches to the L2 (which then settles to the L1), the cost per individual L3 transaction can be driven down to a fraction of a fraction of a cent.

Market Insights and Key Players

The Layer 3 concept is still very new, but the groundwork is being laid by the biggest players in the Layer 2 space.

• Arbitrum has "Orbit," a framework that allows anyone to easily create their own Layer 3 that settles to the Arbitrum network.
• zkSync has "Hyperchains," its vision for an ecosystem of interconnected L3s.
• StarkWare has long envisioned a future with a vibrant ecosystem of Layer 3s built on top of its Starknet L2.

These projects aren't just building a faster highway; they are building the tools to let anyone create their own custom road systems. This is seen by many as the endgame for blockchain scalability—a future with thousands of interconnected, application-specific chains.

What Does This Mean for You as an Investor?

The Layer 3 revolution is still in its early days, and you likely won't be investing in an "L3 token" directly for a while. The real takeaway is understanding that the value will likely flow to the Layer 2s that can attract the most successful Layer 3s.

The L2s that provide the best technology, the most security, and the easiest tools for developers will become the hubs of this new, hyper-scalable future. You are seeing the maturation of the industry, moving from general-purpose chains to a world of specialized applications.

To understand why Bitcoin and cryptocurrency are revolutionary, you first have to understand the architecture they are built on. It isn't just about "digital money"; it is about a fundamental shift in how computers talk to each other. This shift is called Peer-to-Peer (P2P) networking.

In the traditional internet (Web2), we rely on the Client-Server model. When you use Facebook or check your bank balance, you are the "client" requesting data from their centralized "server." The server holds all the power. If the server goes down, or if the bank decides to freeze your account, you are helpless.

P2P networks dismantle this hierarchy. They create a system where everyone is equal, and no single entity holds the keys to the castle.

How P2P Works: The Death of the Middleman

In a P2P network, there is no central server. Instead, the network consists of a distributed group of computers, known as nodes.

Every computer (peer) connected to the network acts as both a client and a server. They share resources—like processing power, disk storage, or network bandwidth—directly with one another.

• Direct Interaction: If Alice wants to send money to Bob, she sends it directly to him. The transaction doesn't route through a PayPal server or a Visa clearinghouse.
• Shared Responsibility: The "ledger" (the record of who owns what) isn't stored in one vault. It is duplicated across thousands of nodes globally.

The Three Pillars of P2P Architecture

Why go through the trouble of building a decentralized network? It comes down to three major advantages over the traditional model.

1. Censorship Resistance
Because there is no central server, there is no head of the snake to cut off. A government or corporation cannot shut down Bitcoin simply by unplugging a computer. To stop the network, they would have to shut down every single node on the planet simultaneously. This makes P2P networks incredibly resilient.

2. Security and Reliability
Centralized servers are honeypots for hackers. If they breach the main database, they steal everyone's data (think of the Equifax hack). In a P2P blockchain, the data is cryptographically secured and distributed. There is no single point of failure. If one node goes offline, the network keeps humming along without interruption.

3. Cost Efficiency
Middlemen are expensive. Banks charge wire fees, and platforms take cuts of every transaction to pay for their massive server farms and staff. By removing the intermediary, P2P networks allow for peer-to-peer value transfer with fees that only cover the cost of network security, often costing a fraction of traditional finance.

Evolution Beyond Money

While Bitcoin was the first major application of P2P technology for finance, the concept is evolving. We are now seeing P2P storage networks (like Filecoin) where users rent out their unused hard drive space, and P2P computing networks where users share graphics card power for AI rendering.

The philosophy remains the same: users should own the network, not rent it from a corporation.

Conclusion

Peer-to-Peer networks are the engine of digital freedom. By shifting power from centralized servers to distributed communities, they enable a financial system that is open, borderless, and impossible to shut down.

In the high-stakes race to solve blockchain interoperability, two names consistently rise to the top: Synapse (SYN) and LayerZero. Both are powerful protocols designed to allow blockchains to communicate, but they achieve this goal through fundamentally different philosophies and technologies. For an investor or developer trying to understand the future of this space, the choice is not as simple as picking a "better" product. It's about understanding two distinct approaches to security, trust, and decentralization. This guide will break down those core differences for you.

Synapse's Approach: The Integrated Bridge and Validator Model

Synapse operates as a holistic, integrated bridging protocol. At its core is its own dedicated blockchain, the Synapse Chain, which acts as a sovereign execution layer. The network is secured by a set of validators who stake SYN tokens. To use a simple analogy, think of Synapse as a heavily guarded, dedicated ferry service. The ferry (the bridge) has its own dedicated crew of security guards (the validators) who are responsible for ensuring every passenger (transaction) gets from one shore (blockchain) to another safely. The security and trust of the entire system are contained within the Synapse ecosystem itself.

LayerZero's Approach: The Universal Messaging Protocol

LayerZero is not a bridge; it is a universal messaging protocol that allows other applications to build bridges on top of it. Its design is based on a novel security model that separates responsibilities. To use our analogy, if Synapse is a ferry, LayerZero is a universal postal service. When you send a message, it is validated by two independent parties: an Oracle (think of a public notary, like Chainlink) and a Relayer (the mail carrier). The crucial innovation is that a message is only considered valid if both the Oracle and the Relayer have independently verified it. This separation of duties is designed to make the system more secure, as it would require both independent parties to collude for a malicious message to get through.

The Core Difference: Security and Trust Assumptions

The fundamental difference between the two protocols lies in their security and trust models. When you use Synapse, your trust is placed entirely in the honesty and security of the Synapse validators. You are trusting that their economic incentives (the SYN they have staked) are sufficient to ensure they act correctly. It is a unified but more concentrated trust model.

When you use an application built on LayerZero, your trust is split. You are trusting that the specific Oracle and Relayer chosen for that application will not collude with each other. It is a more fragmented but potentially more decentralized trust model, as you are not relying on a single set of validators. This is the central debate in the interoperability space, and it addresses the core issue we explored in our guide, [Are Crypto Bridges Safe?].

The Investor's Perspective

From an investment standpoint, this technical difference is crucial. An investment in Synapse (SYN) is a bet on a specific, vertically integrated product. You are betting on the success of its technology, its validator network, and the ecosystem of applications it builds around its bridge. An investment in LayerZero's eventual token would be a bet on a foundational protocol becoming the universal standard—the "TCP/IP for blockchains"—that hundreds of different applications will use for their own cross-chain needs.

Both are powerful contenders in the race to connect the blockchain universe. The ultimate winner will be the one that can prove its model is the most secure, efficient, and decentralized over the long term.

You’ve probably heard the story. A few years ago, people were buying small, simple devices called "hotspots," plugging them in, and earning a significant passive income in Helium (HNT) crypto. It sounded like the perfect set-it-and-forget-it dream.

But if you're looking into it today, you're likely asking a much more cautious question: is Helium mining still profitable?

The short answer is: for most people, it has become much more challenging, but it's not impossible. As your guide, I'm going to give you a completely honest, no-hype breakdown of the factors you need to consider before you spend a single dollar on a miner.

The Core Factors That Determine Your Profitability

Your earning potential isn't a lottery; it's a formula based on several key variables.

1. Your Location (This is the #1 Factor)

The Helium Network is designed to create a decentralized wireless network for the "Internet of Things" (IoT). To do this, it needs hotspots that are spread out.

• The Hex System: The world is divided into geographic areas called "hexes." The network rewards hotspots more for providing coverage in an underserved hex.
• The Problem of Saturation: If your hex is already crowded with other hotspots, you will all be sharing a smaller piece of the rewards pie. Before you do anything else, check the official Helium Explorer map. If your area is already a sea of hotspots, your earning potential will be severely limited.

2. The Shift in Tokens: HNT, IOT, and MOBILE

This is a crucial update that many old guides miss. You no longer mine the HNT coin directly.

• HNT: This is now the "governance" token of the Helium ecosystem.
• IOT: This is the token you earn for providing coverage with a standard IoT hotspot.
• MOBILE: This is the token you earn for providing coverage with a more expensive 5G hotspot.

You earn IOT or MOBILE tokens, which you can then choose to convert to HNT or another currency. Your profitability depends on the current market price of these new tokens.

3. The Cost of Hardware

A standard IoT hotspot can cost anywhere from $100 to $500. A more powerful 5G hotspot can cost over $1,000. You must factor this initial investment into your calculation. How long will it take for your daily earnings to pay back the cost of the hardware?

4. The Halving Schedule

Just like Bitcoin, the Helium network has "halvings" where the amount of new tokens issued is cut in half. This is designed to make the tokens more scarce over time, but it also means the rate at which you earn rewards will decrease.

The Verdict: Who Is Helium Mining For Today?

Given these factors, Helium mining is no longer a get-rich-quick scheme. It is best suited for two types of people:

1. The Tech Enthusiast: Someone who is genuinely interested in building a decentralized network and sees the token earnings as a bonus.
2. The Strategically Located Individual: Someone who has checked the Helium Explorer map and has access to a location in an underserved hex with a clear line of sight.

The Alternative: Investing in the Ecosystem

What if you believe in the vision of the Helium Network but realize that running a miner isn't the right move for you?

The simplest way to gain exposure to the ecosystem's growth is by investing in the tokens directly. This allows you to be part of the project's potential upside without the challenges of hardware setup, location optimization, and variable rewards.

There is no denying that blockchain technology is one of the most significant innovations of the 21st century. It promises to revolutionize finance, supply chains, and digital identity. However, despite the hype and the massive capital inflows, we are not quite living in a decentralized utopia yet.

Like the early internet of the 1990s, blockchain is currently navigating its "awkward teenage years." It is powerful and promising, but it still faces significant hurdles that prevent it from achieving true mass adoption. Understanding these five challenges is essential for any investor or developer looking at the long-term picture.

1. Scalability: The Traffic Jam Problem

The most immediate hurdle is scalability. In its current state, many blockchains are victims of their own success. When too many people use the network, it clogs up.

• The Comparison: Visa can handle roughly 24,000 transactions per second (TPS). Bitcoin, in its base layer form, handles about 7. Ethereum handles about 15-30.
• The Consequence: When demand outstrips supply, transaction fees (gas) skyrocket, and confirmation times slow to a crawl.

Developers are racing to solve this with Layer-2 solutions (like Lightning Network and Rollups) and sharding, but achieving speed without sacrificing security remains the industry's "Holy Grail."

2. Regulatory Uncertainty: The Legal Grey Area

Innovation moves fast; legislation moves slow. This gap creates a dangerous environment of regulatory uncertainty.

Businesses are hesitant to build on blockchain rails because they don't know if the rules will change tomorrow. Is a token a security or a commodity? How do you tax a DAO? Will the government ban self-custody wallets? Until governments provide clear, consistent legal frameworks (like the EU's MiCA regulation), institutional capital will remain cautious.

3. Interoperability: The Isolated Islands

Currently, the blockchain ecosystem looks like a series of disconnected islands. Bitcoin cannot speak to Ethereum. Solana cannot speak to Cardano.

If you have value on one chain, moving it to another is difficult, risky, and often requires trusting a centralized bridge (which is a common target for hackers). Interoperability—the ability for different computer systems to exchange and make use of information—is crucial. We need a "universal translator" for blockchains to create a seamless, unified web of value.

4. Energy Consumption and Sustainability

This is the challenge that dominates the mainstream headlines. Proof of Work (PoW) blockchains like Bitcoin require massive amounts of computing power, leading to high energy consumption.

While proponents argue that Bitcoin uses a high percentage of renewable energy, the environmental narrative remains a barrier for ESG-conscious investors and corporations. The industry is responding—Ethereum slashed its energy use by 99% by switching to Proof of Stake—but the debate around crypto's carbon footprint is far from over.

5. Complexity and User Experience (UX)

Finally, the biggest barrier for your average grandmother is simply that crypto is too hard to use.

Managing private keys, understanding gas fees, navigating wallet addresses that look like random strings of code—it is intimidating. One mistake, and your money is gone forever. For blockchain to reach billions of users, the technology needs to become invisible. It needs to work as simply as sending an email or swiping a credit card.

Conclusion

These challenges are significant, but they are not insurmountable. The smartest minds in computer science and economics are currently working on solving them. As we conquer scalability, clarity, and usability, the friction will disappear, leaving only the value.

If you've spent any time exploring yield farming, you've undoubtedly come across its most intimidating and misunderstood risk: Impermanent Loss. It sounds scary, it's confusing, and it's the number one reason newcomers lose money, even when they think they're earning a profit.

But it doesn't have to be a mystery. As your guide, I'm going to demystify this concept for you. We'll use a simple analogy and a clear example to show you exactly what it is, how it happens, and how to think about it as part of your strategy.

The Core Concept: The Balancing Scale

Before we can understand Impermanent Loss, we must first understand how a typical liquidity pool works. Most pools, especially for yield farming, are like a perfectly balanced scale. You must deposit an equal value of two different assets. For example, if you want to provide liquidity to an ETH/USDC pool and Ethereum is worth $3,000, you would need to deposit 1 ETH and 3,000 USDC. Your total deposit is worth $6,000, perfectly balanced 50/50 in value. The protocol's job is to always keep this scale balanced, no matter what.

What Impermanent Loss Actually Is

Now, here is the most important thing to understand: Impermanent Loss is not a loss in the traditional sense. It is an opportunity cost. It is the difference in value between your assets inside the liquidity pool versus what their value would have been if you had simply held them in your wallet. This difference occurs when the price of one of the assets changes significantly compared to the other.

A Practical Example in Action

Let's go back to our balancing scale. You deposited 1 ETH and 3,000 USDC into the pool. Now, imagine the price of Ethereum doubles to $6,000 on the open market. Arbitrage traders will now come to your pool and buy the "cheap" ETH from it until the pool's price matches the market. To keep the scale balanced at a 50/50 value ratio, the pool's algorithm will have sold some of your ETH as its price went up.

Your pool now contains approximately 0.707 ETH and 4,242 USDC. The total value is $8,484. That's a great profit! But wait. What if you had just held your original 1 ETH and 3,000 USDC in your wallet? Their value would now be $6,000 (from the ETH) + $3,000 (from the USDC) = $9,000.

The difference—$9,000 - 8,484—is **516**. That is your Impermanent Loss. It's "impermanent" because if the price of ETH returns to its original price of $3,000, this loss disappears.

So, Why Would Anyone Do This? The Role of Fees

You might be asking, "Why would I ever provide liquidity if I'm just going to underperform holding?" The answer is trading fees. As a liquidity provider, you earn a percentage of the fees from every trade that happens in your pool. The entire game of yield farming is a bet that the fees you earn over time will be greater than any impermanent loss you might incur.

Understanding this risk is absolutely essential before you engage in any form of yield farming, especially the more complex strategies like [cross-chain yield farming].

In the world of cryptocurrency, history has taught us one profitable lesson: Bet on the House.

Exchange tokens like Binance Coin (BNB) created millionaires in the last cycle. But as we head into the 2025 bull run, the landscape is shifting. Investors are no longer just looking for the biggest exchange; they are looking for the next explosion in growth.

This brings us to the ultimate showdown: BNB vs. KCS vs. BGB.

Should you stick with the massive safety of Binance, the passive income of KuCoin, or the aggressive growth of Bitget? Let’s break down the numbers to find the best investment for your portfolio.

Binance Coin (BNB): The "Blue Chip" Safety Play

BNB is the undisputed king of exchange tokens. With a market cap ranging between $80 to $100 billion, it is a giant. It powers the entire BNB Chain ecosystem and is burned quarterly to reduce supply.

However, from an investment standpoint, size is the enemy of growth. For BNB to pull a 10x return from here, it would need to reach a market cap of nearly $1 Trillion—roughly the size of Bitcoin today. While BNB offers safety and stability during bear markets, it is unlikely to offer the life-changing multipliers that smaller caps provide.

• Verdict: Buy BNB if you want to protect your wealth, not multiply it aggressively.

Bitget Token (BGB): The High-Growth Challenger

If BNB is the "Apple" of crypto exchanges, Bitget Token (BGB) is the rising startup that just went public.

BGB has been an outlier in the market, consistently breaking All-Time Highs even when the rest of the market was flat. The investment thesis here is simple: Undervaluation.

Bitget is aggressively capturing market share through partnerships (like Lionel Messi) and a robust Launchpad that demands users hold BGB to enter. Yet, its market cap is a tiny fraction of BNB’s. If Bitget captures even 10% of Binance’s volume, the BGB price has significant room to run. It offers the best risk-to-reward ratio for the 2025 cycle.

• Verdict: Buy BGB if you are looking for maximum upside potential.

KuCoin Token (KCS): The Passive Income Play

KuCoin Token (KCS) has a loyal following for one specific reason: Daily Dividends.

Unlike other tokens that rely on price appreciation, KCS pays you daily. Holding just 6 KCS entitles you to a share of 50% of the exchange's daily trading fees. It’s a fantastic model for cash-flow investors.

However, KCS has struggled to maintain the same price momentum as BGB. While the dividends are nice, they often don't make up for the opportunity cost of missing out on a faster-moving asset.

• Verdict: Buy KCS if you want steady, small daily rewards and don't mind slower price growth.

Conclusion: Which Token Should You Buy?

The choice comes down to your risk appetite:

1. Low Risk: Stick with BNB. It’s too big to fail.

2. Income Seeker: Stick with KCS for the daily payouts.

3. High Growth: Rotate into BGB. It currently has the strongest momentum and the most room to grow before it hits a "ceiling."

When most people hear the word "blockchain," they immediately think of Bitcoin. They imagine a completely open, anonymous, and decentralized network where anyone can participate. While that is true for Bitcoin, it is only one piece of a much larger puzzle.

As blockchain technology has matured, it has branched out. Just as there are different types of databases (cloud, local, shared), there are different types of blockchains designed for specific needs. Understanding these distinctions—Public, Private, Consortium, and Hybrid—is essential for grasping how this technology is reshaping industries beyond just finance.

1. Public Blockchains (Permissionless)

This is the blockchain in its purest form. A Public Blockchain is completely open. Anyone, anywhere in the world, can download the software, view the ledger, and participate in the consensus process (mining or staking).

• Key Feature: True Decentralization. No single entity controls the network. It is censorship-resistant.
• Examples: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana.
• Best For: Cryptocurrencies, decentralized finance (DeFi), and public digital identity. Since no permission is needed to join, these networks rely on economic incentives (tokens) to keep participants honest.

2. Private Blockchains (Permissioned)

On the opposite end of the spectrum is the Private Blockchain. These networks are closed environments, usually controlled by a single organization. You cannot just join; you must be invited and verified.

• Key Feature: Speed and Privacy. Because there are fewer nodes and they are all trusted entities, transactions can be processed incredibly fast. The data is kept confidential from the public eye.
• Examples: Hyperledger Fabric, Ripple (in certain enterprise implementations).
• Best For: Internal corporate data management, supply chain tracking within a single company, or government record-keeping. It offers the security of blockchain without exposing trade secrets to the world.

3. Consortium Blockchains (Federated)

What happens when a group of companies wants to work together but they don't trust each other fully? Enter the Consortium Blockchain.

This is a "semi-decentralized" model. Instead of one company controlling the network (Private) or everyone controlling it (Public), a pre-selected group of organizations shares control. For example, a network of 10 banks might agree that 7 of them must sign off on a transaction for it to be valid.

• Key Feature: Collaborative Trust. It allows competitors to cooperate on a shared infrastructure without giving up total control to a rival.
• Best For: Banking networks, international shipping logistics, and healthcare research sharing.

4. Hybrid Blockchains

As the name suggests, Hybrid Blockchains try to offer the best of both worlds. They typically use a private, permissioned chain to handle fast, private transactions, while periodically anchoring data to a public blockchain for security and immutability.

• Key Feature: Flexibility. A company can keep its customer data private (Private side) but prove to the public that the data hasn't been tampered with (Public side).
• Best For: Real estate, retail loyalty programs, and medical records.

Conclusion

Blockchain is not a one-size-fits-all technology. While Public Blockchains like Bitcoin capture the headlines and the investment capital, Private and Consortium chains are quietly revolutionizing the backend of global enterprise.

However, for the individual investor and trader, the Public Blockchain is where the opportunity lies. This is the layer where value is exchanged freely and openly.